Editorial standards
Useful guidance must be clear about where it came from.
This policy explains how Odin Reach turns videos, experience, research, and practical frameworks into written guidance for business owners.
Source and authorship
Who creates the content.
Articles are published under the person responsible for the ideas and final guidance. Most video-based articles begin with a video or interview by Marlon Roldan. The source video is linked on the article so readers can review the original discussion.
Production process
How a video becomes an article.
Identify the main question
The article keeps the central idea of the video and defines the business owner it should help.
Organize the transcript
Repeated lines, spoken filler, and details that need missing video context are removed or explained.
Add written value
The article may add examples, comparison tables, checklists, definitions, and links to primary sources.
Review before publishing
Names, claims, links, structure, metadata, and reading level are checked. Unsupported results are not added.
AI assistance
AI may help with production, not accountability.
AI tools may help clean transcripts, organize notes, compare structures, or prepare an early draft. A person remains responsible for the final topic, claims, sources, examples, and recommendation. AI assistance is not treated as evidence.
Sources and updates
Primary sources come first.
Product details should link to the company that published them. Legal and regulatory information should link to the responsible authority. Interview opinions should be named as opinions. A modified date should change only after a useful content update, not a layout adjustment.
If a fast-changing tool is discussed, readers should check the linked product documentation before making an important decision.
Corrections
Accuracy matters after publication.
When a material error is found, Odin Reach will correct the article and update its modified date. Small spelling or layout fixes do not represent a substantive content update.